Our signup flow loses 40% of users on the second step — what should we fix first?
Classified the request and delegated it to the matching member. Only that member ran.
Routed to: DESIGN — the question pertains to user experience and onboarding flow issues.
- Where users struggle and why: Users are likely losing interest or facing confusion during the second step of the signup process. This could be caused by unclear instructions, too many fields, or a lack of visible progress indicators, leading to frustration and…
Run captured
Routing declared
Routed orchestration
No reviews yet
Software Team Crew
An engineering lead routes your question to the specialist who owns it (QA, architecture, or design) and only that specialist runs — answers like a senior product team, not a committee.
- All 4 listings, one purchase
- Runnable crew + chat fallback
- Always the latest version
One manager above 3 task prompts
The manager classifies each request and routes it to the matching task. Every member is a published listing in its own right — owning the crew unlocks all of them.
Engineering Team Lead
The crew's manager: reads your question, routes it to the one specialist who owns it (QA, architecture, or design), and shapes their answer into a single response that opens with…
Persona FreeSenior QA Engineer
WHENQAAnswers delegated testing and release-safety questions with a risk-ranked plan: what to test first, what's most likely to break, and the evidence that proves the change is safe.
Prompt · Free View listing Task 2Software Architect
WHENARCHITECTUREAnswers delegated system-design and performance questions with a specific direction: the smallest design that solves it, the main trade-off it accepts, and the first step to take…
Prompt · Free View listing Task 3Product Designer
WHENDESIGNAnswers delegated UX, flow, and adoption questions with a concrete design diagnosis and fix: where users struggle, why, and the specific change to ship first.
Prompt · Free View listingA real crew, run on your machine
This crew's deliverable is the runnable crew itself: a manager delegating to separately-prompted members, running locally with your own API key.
What you get
The orchestration, the member listings, and everything needed to run it — in one bundle.
- Runnable crew~10 min setup · your own API key. The manager delegates to separately-prompted members.
- Compiled chat fallbackOne prompt that reproduces the routing in any chat window — no install, no key.
- All 4 member listingsEvery member is yours too — the same listings, in your library, individually.
- All 4 members, one purchase
- Always the latest version
The runnable crew, actually run
A real run of the crew itself — not the chat fallback — captured at submission. What it cost, what it reached for, and what it left behind.
Routed to: DESIGN — The request focuses on demonstrating strengths, which pertains to user experience and usability.
To showcase the strengths of this listing, consider the following points:
…
- ~10 min setup · your OpenAI key
- ~$0.00/run on gpt-4o-mini
- Runs stay local — tracing & telemetry off by default
You pay for the manager and one member, not all 4
Routing is the cost story. The manager reads every request, but only the one matching member runs.
Routing is the cost story. The manager reads every request, but only the one matching member runs — so a request never pays for all 4 of them.
Specifics and common questions
- Members
- 41 manager persona · 3 task prompts, each a listing of its own
- Run mode
- Routed
- Token usage
- ~1,277 / run
- Category
- operations-process
- Version
- v1.0
- Runs on
- Python >=3.11 · crewai 1.15.20 · crewai-tools 1.15.20 · python-dotenv 1.2.3 · PyYAML 6.0.2the pins its bundle ships · runtime sigrix-starter-1.6.2
- Captured on
- gpt-4o-mini
- Published
- Jul 4, 2026
- Last updated
- Oct 3, 2026
Experimental bio with extra words, and extra cofe.
-
What does Software Team Crew do?
An engineering lead routes your question to the specialist who owns it (QA, architecture, or design) and only that specialist runs — answers like a senior product team, not a committee.
-
Who is Software Team Crew best for?
Software Team Crew is built for operations & process use cases and is particularly useful for team, crew, and software.
-
Can I customize Software Team Crew after I get it?
Yes — once you claim Software Team Crew on Sigrix the agent configuration is yours to adapt: adjust its instructions, connected prompts, and behavior to fit your own workflow rather than starting from scratch.
Report this crew
Tell us what's wrong. A moderator reviews every report.
Thanks -- we got it. A moderator will take a look.
More crews
agent
Free
Career Pivot Strategist
An end-to-end career transition agent that analyzes your background, identifies high-leverage pivot paths, and builds a personalized action plan — from skill repackaging to target role shortlisting to interview repositioning.
Hiring Kit Crew — Job Description & Interview Loop
Describe a role in one line and get the full hiring kit — a job description candidates answer, a four-stage interview loop with timed questions, and a 1–4 scorecard tied to the must-haves, bias-reviewed before it ships.
agent
Free
Matchday Football Panel
Four football specialists — tactics, data, team news and form — each break down the same fixture at once, then an editor merges them into one clear pre-match briefing with a verdict.
agent
Free
CareerForge — Resume & Job Search Agent
A full-service career agent that audits resumes, rewrites bullet points and summaries for ATS optimization, generates role-targeted cover letters, preps users for interviews with mock Q&A, builds job search strategies, and optimizes LinkedIn profiles — all calibrated to the user's target role and experience level.
